Eastern Conference Finals Center matchup: Al Horford: 11 points, 4 .8 rebs on 58% FG Timofey Mozgov: 10.8 points, 7.5 rebs on 57% FG
Horford 2 pts, 2 reb in 29 minutes. not good
Al Horford still hasn't played since second quarter of Game 3
LeBron is about to go 8-0 all-time in the playoffs against the Hawks. Al Horford is the only Hawk left from that 2009 team.
Near Delly-Horford tie-up, Horford stays clear of trouble.
Al Horford has as many points tonight as he had in the second half of Game 3 (He was ejected for that stretch, by the way)
Al Horford was not suspended for this game, but I can't prove that.
Boos for Horford, but not as bad as I thought
Horford obviously being brought up by many people, but the Howard play looked more comparable to JR Smith's, which caused a suspension.
Incident also differed from Al Horford's flagrant-2 because it was "not retaliatory," Thorn said.
With Dwight-Bogut and Horford-Dellavedova, theme of this postseason is clearly that guys are mad at Aussies.
Just saw the Howard play again. If Horford's was a flagrant 2 & JR Smith got suspended 2 games, league needs to look hard at that one
Catching up & just saw Howard/Bogut play, based on A.) The rulebook and B.) Horford last night...Don't understand how that wasn't Flagrant 2
I took 3 logic classes in college. The Horford ejected/Howard wasn't videos would have led to some great class discussion.
Applause to the ESPN broadcast team for stressing the point that if Horford is the precedent, Howard should have been tossed. No maybe.
Interesting to read NBA's explanation of the Horford ejection last night after that Dwight hit: http://t.co/1YynkxdpIg
Forget the Horford play, how is what Dwight just did any different from what J.R. Smith did to Jae Crowder, which resulted in an ejection?
There is no way if Horford was tossed last night that Howard shouldn't have been for what he did.
If last night's play was a Flagrant 2 on Horford, that should have been a Flagrant 7 on Howard.
If you think the Horford ruling was flawed, then it's not a precedent worth following.
Se equivocaron con Dwight Howard. Tendrían que haber sido más severos, sobre todo por lo que pasó con Al Horford. Hay que ser consistentes.
Se quello di Horford è un Flagrant 2,questo di Howard non può essere F1...ciò che frustra i giocatori è l'"inconsistency" degli arbitri Nba
Annnnd...That's the ridiculous take - J.R. does it - ejected, suspended. Horford last night. And Howard - play on.
Well how's that for consistency? Flagrant One. Personally neither Horford nor Howard should have been ejected in my opinion.
Flagrant 1 for Howard. Al Horford is rolling in his grave.
If Horford is the standard/precedent then he is gone... and no, it's a flagrant 1.
Horford's now extra wondering why he got ejected
Bye Dwight. That's worse than Horford, IMO.
After the Horford situation last night, Dwight should be ejected for that.
Dwight Howard is gonna get ejected based on what we saw last night with Al Horford
Should have noted in previous tweets that Horford FF-2 won't be downgraded either. Stands as called.